The World Bank commented on the MoU between Enron and the
MSEB as that it was biased in favour Enron. After the WB’s comment on the MoU the GOI’s Central Electricity Authority (CEA) did their own analysis and
found certain abnormalities in the MoU. The findings include:
i) no specific details of project costs were provided as per
Indian Law
ii) the date of start of the contract and payments were not
mentioned i.e when the electricity is available or when the contract was signed
iii) the payment structure was different from the usual
norms
iv) high price of power higher than anywhere else in the
country
v) no provision to scrutinize the project was made to make
sure that the payment of MSEB was corresponding to the actual electricity cost
vi) while MSEB guaranteed to buy a minimum amount of fuel,
the fuel supplier was not adhered to providing minimum fuel.
vii) no study of economical justification or verification of
the price of fuel was done by MSEB
Even after all these findings the authoritative bodies of the GOI gave approval for the project which was immediately followed by MSEB signing the PPA with Enron.
Still even more anomalies can be observed in the project which makes it obvious of the quantum of illegal movements which would have taken place in the project.
Article ref: http://www.atimes.com/reports/CA13Ai01.html
2 comments:
Possibly because of the lack of experience of the government with regard to PPP's? Either way, you're not supposed to play a game if you don't know the rules.
The MSEB should have analyzed the conditions more carefully, it's not like they were strong armed into this deal. This still does not justify what happened in the end..
kobe 9
cheap snapbacks
michael kors handbags sale
pittsburgh steelers jersey
texans jerseys
nike blazer
replica rolex
ray ban sunglasses
air jordan 4
miami heat
Post a Comment